Friday, July 23, 2021

“Emma”, by Jane Austen

 

382 pages, The Folio Society

The heroine of Emma is Emma Woodhouse, the precocious 20-year-old resident of the village of Highbury who imagines herself to be a matchmaker par excellence, having conspired to bring together Miss Taylor, her one-time governess, and Mr. Weston, a widower from the village. Emma decides that her next task is to find a husband for Harriet Smith, her new friend whose parentage is unknown, a subtle aside form Austen that she is illegitimate. This is the first instance of Austen’s courage in writing this book, as one of the main characters, Harriet Smith, is illegitimate, a fact of the life through the ages and the world over, which was rarely mentioned. But by putting this fact front and center, Austen forces her reader to acknowledge this uncomfortable fact, and what they think of it. But Emma is convinced that Harriet is a gentleman’s daughter and, thus, deserves to be a gentleman’s wife, and so the Highbury busybody sets out to make that happen. Emma decides that the vicar of Highbury, Mr. Elton, is just the man, but she must first persuade Harriet to reject the proposal of Robert Martin, a well-to-do farmer for whom Harriet clearly has feelings but who does not measure up in Emma’s eyes.

With Emma’s encouragement, Harriet becomes infatuated with Mr. Elton – but Mr. Elton, in turn, has fallen for Emma, much to her chagrin as she realizes that her desire to make a match for Harriet has blinded her to the facts of the situation. Elton, spurned by Emma and offended by the very idea that the illegitimate Harriet could possibly be his equal, leaves Highbury for Bath and marries a wealthy woman there on the rebound. Meanwhile, Emma’s brother-in-law and treasured friend, Mr. Knightly, watches all of her goings on with a critical eye, especially as he thinks Robert Martin would have been a perfect match for her friend Harriet. They quarrel over Emma’s meddling and, as usual, Mr. Knightley proves to be the wiser of the pair. Here is Austen’s second act of courage, in showing that her heroine is – wait for it – wrong; worse, from a modern-day perspective, Mr. Knightly – a MAN – is right. How many authors have the guts to put their main character in such a situation? But in so doing, Austen makes Emma human and, thus, more relatable to the reader. It is then left to Emma to comfort her friend and to speculate about the character of a new visitor expected in Highbury; namely, Mr. Weston’s son, the much-discussed Frank Churchill.

After Churchill’s aunt and uncle took him as the heir to their estate, they have seen fit to raise him in London, away from his natural father, but he is at long last set to visit his father. The good people of Highbury know nothing of Frank Churchill, who hasn’t visited until now because of his aunt’s many illnesses (not all of which, it is implied, are legitimate). Upon Churchill’s long-awaited arrival, Mr. Knightley is immediately suspicious of the young man, a suspicion that is compounded when he rushes off again for London – for a haircut, of all things. Emma, however, is captivated by the dashing Churchill, and can’t help but notice that his attentions seem to be directed at her. While Emma initially tries to dissuade Churchill, she can’t help but find herself flattered by his charms, and the two of them flirt outrageously with one another. What we seem to see here is Austen setting up another of her against-the-odds romances in which true love conquers all – but stay tuned, Dear Reader, for all is not necessarily what it seems.

Another recent addition to Highbury is the beautiful and accomplished Jane Fairfax, whom Emma is less than enamored with, not least because Jane is reserved where Emma is outgoing – but, as Austen implies, Emma as most jealous of Jane as a rival, for soon all talk and gossip is about Miss Fairfax and not Miss Woodhouse (has Austen just made her heroine not only wrong, but catty, to boot?). To Emma’s consternation, Knightley defends Jane, saying that she deserves their compassion for, unlike Emma, Jane has no independent fortune and must soon leave home to work as a governess and make her way in the world. But Mrs. Weston suspects that the warmth of Knightley’s defense of Jane comes from the romantic feelings he has developed for her, an implication Emma resists, although she can’t quite understand why she does so. From this time, most of Highbury assumes that Churchill and Emma have formed an attachment, though Emma soon dismisses Frank as a potential suitor (for she has no plans to marry anyone) and imagines him as a match for Harriet.

At the village ball Emma and Churchill put on, Harriet finds herself humiliated by Mr. Elton and his haughty new wife, only to be rescued by Knightly when he asks her to dance, a move that earns him high marks in Emma’s eyes. Next day, Churchill saves Harriet from a gang of gypsy beggars, so that when Harriet tells Emma that she has fallen in love with a man above her station, Emma naturally believes that she is referring to Churchill. Knightley suspects that there is an attachment is between Churchill and Jane, but his warnings to Emma fall on deaf ears; worse, at a picnic attended by the great and good of Highbury, Emma insults Miss Bates, a kindhearted spinster and Jane’s aunt, losing her Knightley’s approval, to her shame. And here is Austen’s third authorial act of courage, for how many heroines can you name that are bitchy? While Emma ultimately does the right thing and apologizes to Miss Bates, this whole scenario shows once again that Emma is not perfect, sometimes thinks very highly of herself and even sometimes does and says the wrong thing, just like the rest of us. It is the rare author indeed who has the will, to say nothing of the ability, to make so human a character.

News comes that Churchill’s aunt has at long last died, and this event paves the way for an unexpected revelation that solves the mysteries of the man: Frank Churchill and Jane Fairfax have, in fact, been secretly engaged the whole time, and his attentions towards Emma have been nothing but a smoke screen to hide his true state. Emma worries that Harriet will be crushed, but she soon discovers that it is Knightley, not Churchill, who is the object of her friend’s affections; and she believes that Knightley shares her affections. Emma finds that she is distressed by Harriet’s revelation – for it is now that Emma sees that she, too, is in love with Knightley – who, happily, declares his love for Emma. But the disappointed Harriet is soon comforted by a second marriage proposal from Robert Martin and, this time, she accepts with alacrity. The novel ends with the marriage of Harriet and Mr. Martin, and that of Emma and Mr. Knightley, resolving the question of who loves whom after all.

It has long been agreed that Emma Woodhouse is Jane Austen’s most popular heroine, but as to why this should be so is, to some, a mystery: she is beautiful, rich, coddled, interfering, opinionated and convinced that she is always right. What is there to love? Especially when you compare her to Austen’s other characters, her struggles pale in comparison: The Dashwood sisters of Sense and Sensibility must, for the first time, work to earn their keep and their places in life; Elizabeth Bennet of Pride and Prejudice is, along with her four sisters, looking at a life of penury or, at best, loveless marriages; Fanny Price of Mansfield Park is shipped off to her rich relations as a charity case where she is treated more like a servant than a family member; Catherine Morland of Northanger Abbey is one of a brood of ten who retreats into an over-active imagination to better handle the rigors of life; and Anne Elliot of Persuasion is a middle-aged woman looking at a long spinsterhood after having rejected the love of her life for material reasons. Compared to these women, Emma is a privileged brat with nothing to complain about.

So, just what is it about Emma, anyway? Why the popularity? I think it’s because Emma is a real person: she is imperfect, shallow, completely oblivious to her own faults, often mean-spirited and quite unfeeling but, damnit, we like her and want her to be successful and happy. We care for Emma and her antics, while simultaneously deriding them as ridiculous, like we would a close friend or fond acquaintance. Emma’s upper-class world is both limited and without breadth, but it is her world and she moves through it with sentiment and grace. Her foibles and missteps are really rather minor and certainly forgivable, and Austen presents this immaculate portrait of a flawed heroine who is at once as good a person as she can be and as unimportant as her tiny stage indicates. It is a delightful picture of a time long past and people who have no interests beyond their own little lives, and need not have them. So maybe that’s why Emma is loved by so many: we recognize ourselves and others that we love in her, which makes her real and relatable too, in spite of the fact that her world is long gone.

Monday, July 19, 2021

“The Life of Elizabeth I”, by Alison Weir

 

532 pages, Ballantine Books, ISBN-13: 978-0345405333

Alison Weir is one of those authors (there are several now) whose books I buy before bothering to even learn what they are about. For the last couple of years she has segued into historical fiction (I may have to start in on those books one of these days), but before that she was an historian writing on British history, such as The Six Wives of Henry VIII (reviewed on April 7, 2015), The Princes in the Tower (reviewed on May 5, 2015) and The Children of Henry VIII (reviewed on October 14, 2015), amongst many others I have yet to get. And so we come to The Life of Elizabeth I, and it is, as is to be expected about any book by the divine Mrs. Weir, superb. Elizabeth was a most remarkable woman, very much her father’s daughter (for good and ill). Weir does a great job portraying how Elizabeth grew up around the intrigues of Henry VIII’s court, when she was in and out of favor, and her and the peoples’ great admiration of her father. She loved the processions and the admiration of the people and understood that, from this, came power. Elizabeth saw and learned from Henry’s mistakes, as well as those of her siblings, Edward VI and Mary I. In many ways I appreciated Weir’s book all the more after having read Lisa Hilton’s Elizabeth: Renaissance Prince (reviewed on September 10th, 2019), for many of Hilton’s points were anticipated by Weir, 20 years before. Bravo, madam, bravo.

Weir’s biography is a standard history of her subject’s life, starting with her birth and ending with her death, tracing of the arc of her life and her reign and weaving together the trials and travails of Elizabeth’s personal life, her court life and the political context in which she operated. It’s all here, the relationships Elizabeth sustained with intriguing people such as Mary, Queen of Scots (how Mary could have survived so long given her perpetual scheming to overthrow Elizabeth is stunning), Robert Dudley, the Earl of Leicester, his stepson Robert Devereaux, the Earl of Essex, Lord Burghley and the rest. Also well done is the tale of her on and off again courtships with foreign leaders, as she moved to produce an heir (but not really), create useful political alliances and retain her hold on power (this last one always trumping the other two). To keep all of this straight, Weir has broken Elizabeth’s life into categories, with one chapter treating the religious conflict in Europe and how it affected various factions in England, another chapter describing the cast of characters in her life and how they affected her decisions, another one tackling the clothing, jewelry and crowns that Elizabeth wore, another the various castles of that era in both England and Scotland, and so on. There were many characters in her life, and it could have gotten confusing very quickly, but Weir does an excellent job of presenting them in such a way that it was easy to keep track of who was who.

The Life of Elizabeth I doesn’t offer much of a new perspective or new information, being a rather standard biography of the Virgin Queen, but Alison Weir is  one of my go-to historians (see my praise from above), which makes this as enjoyable a read as any.

Friday, July 16, 2021

“All the Trouble in the World: The Lighter Side of Overpopulation, Famine, Ecological Disaster, Ethnic Hatred, Plague, and Poverty”, by P. J. O’Rourke

 

341 pages, Atlantic Monthly Press, ISBN-13: 978-0871135803

Okay, here we go: All the Trouble in the World: The Lighter Side of Overpopulation, Famine, Ecological Disaster, Ethnic Hatred, Plague, and Poverty by P. J. O’Rourke is guaranteed to get on the nerves of all of you left-wing dope-smoking woke intersectional snowflake mental pygmy always-on-the-lookout-to-be-offended types, so be warned. Written back in ’94, this, O’Rourke’s 7th independently written book, takes on several topics that were hot way back when: overpopulation, famine, ecological apocalypse, multiculturalism and miserable third world regimes that hide their brutality and failure behind the facade of socialism and first world envy (come to think of it, some things never change). Interspersed behind the spot-on barbs and wise-guy cracks are the usual thoughtful analysis and intelligent criticism; for example, O’Rourke compares Bangladesh with Fresno, California: both have the same density, but find themselves in dramatically different conditions, for while Bangladesh has some problems not found in Fresno, O’Rourke argues it’s lack of free markets and a creaking bureaucracy overwhelm what had historically been a pretty productive population. Of course, his travels there set the stage for many like humorous observations and situations.

Some of the best chapters focus on our own living room liberals: those whose mission it is to save America from itself. Two chapters on multiculturalism and the world environmental movement show the length to which people who think of themselves as “liberal” have really become authoritarians who brook no dissent (nor inconvenient facts) in their quest to make the world right by their minds. The jokes just write themselves in these chapters – there is such a gulf between some of these people and the real world (not to mention freedom and the Constitution) – that one alternates between laughter and amazement when reading of what is being done for us by those who don’t trust us. Sometimes the humor wears thin, but a little time between chapters keeps the material more fresh and sharp. But O’Rourke undergirds all of his criticisms (this is a critical analysis) with facts and thoughtful arguments. He doesn’t necessarily have all the answers, but he does have a different and refreshing perspective on all the trouble in the world.