320
pages, Anchor Books, ISBN-13: 978-0385092609
Many
consider The Old Regime and the French
Revolution to be nothing more than Alexis de Tocqueville’s “other book”,
taking a backseat to his better known work Democracy
in America. Readers who are merely interested in guillotines should look
elsewhere, though: other authors had already covered the events of the
revolution, and de Tocqueville does not duplicate material where he has nothing
significant to add. Instead, he looks at a premise that other historians had
accepted uncritically: that the revolution had happened because the people were
oppressed. While oppression was not unique to the 18th Century, why
had the people overthrown their government at that time rather than another
era? Prior to de Tocqueville that question had neither been asked nor answered
in a serious way, so he delved into documents that no one before him had
studied: archival tax records. Although such material risks becoming dense, de
Tocqueville’s style is engaging and he keeps the purpose of the inquiry
uppermost: What was the true aim of the Revolution? What was its specific
character? Why did it take place and what exactly did it achieve?
The Old Regime and
the French Revolution
was ahead of its time, using methodologies that would not be reused by significant
numbers of historians until the 1960s. De Tocqueville’s approach yields rich
insights about any country and any era where bureaucratic archives exist in
sufficient quantity to undertake a meaningful statistical analysis. This had
always been a well-regarded book; for 50 years now it has also acquired
recognition as a seminal work of social history. There is nothing else in the
subfield that approaches it in terms of innovative analytical methods. For
these reasons alone this book is of interest to anyone who wants to know how
the study of history is done and why it remains in print in so many editions
and why it is discussed in so many classrooms. We live in a world where
political forces try to shape our future by telling us our heritage; this
happens in all sorts of places while most people (even those with university
educations) lack the skills to distinguish serious historical analysis from bullshit.
That is a dangerous area to remain ignorant in where what someone wants is one’s
vote.
No comments:
Post a Comment