256
pages, Simon & Schuster, ISBN-13: 978-0684849560
Christina
Hoff Sommers articulates what is wrong with modern-day with feminism, and it is
not that it has fostered achievement for women; rather it is feminism’s
attempts to demean the roles and achievements of men and feminize boys that are
problematic. To the extent that feminism has encouraged girls and women to
strive for excellence, it should be lauded; to the extent that it has used our
institutions – particularly our schools – as a vehicle to establish a so-called
“new feminist order” at the expense of men, it should be called-out and combatted.
And
combat Sommers does, as her research demonstrates that our schools are disproportionately
influenced by biased (and all too frequently suspect) feminist theory and are
clearly engaged in institutional male bashing, from: chastising boys for
engaging in naturally aggressive play to attacking male oriented sports such as
football (unless, of course a girl wants to participate) to denouncing
fraternities (while saying nothing about sororities) to frequently ignoring the
achievements of boys (while sometimes artificially inflating those of girls and
young women) to minimizing the role and importance of the male role model (i.e.
fathers). It appears that feminist-influenced educators seem bent not on
leveling the playing field, but tilting it towards Venus; and if our sons fall
off in the process, well, that's unfortunate.
Perhaps
this is best seen in the way test results are viewed. When young women achieve
higher scores than men in, say, verbal skills (which by the way are much more
susceptible to subjective interpretation than tests for math and science), feminists
attribute this to women’s perceived superior ability to communicate, and there
is nary a mention of having to do more to eradicate the disparity. However,
when young men achieve higher scores, say, in math, it is attributed to
systemic discrimination that must be remedied, and not to any inherently
positive male attribute (this despite studies that many feminists like to
ignore showing that men perhaps have innate skills in this area that are
superior to those of most women). Similarly, not much alarm is expressed either
in schools or by our “leaders” at large at the inordinately high male dropout
rate or relatively low level of boys attending college as compared to girls; indeed,
at times one may believe that this is perhaps tolerated since it is now “the
girl’s turn”, though the boys who are being sacrificed had not a thing to do
with past discrimination against females. Finally, one need only look at how
quickly school officials will recommend that a little boy be placed on Ritalin
simply because he doesn't pay attention like a little girl does, rather than
force the teacher (all too frequently a woman) to deal with the behavior, to
see the war against boys in its most graphic terms. Again, imagine the outcry
if our institutions tried to medicate a little girl out of a naturally female
tendency.
Of course, the answer
is to encourage both boys and girls to realize their full potential, which Sommers
advocates. More important, though, is Sommers’ frequently stated belief, based
on her research, that both genders be encouraged to achieve and develop on
their own terms, rather than by transforming one into the other. Hopefully the
PC police that currently wield inordinate power in our educational and social
institutions will not ignore excellent research such as that presented by Hoff
Sommers, or the eventual ensuing backlash may well trim the legitimate and necessary
gains that women have made in the recent past.