320
pages, Virgin Books, ISBN-13: 978-1852271343
In
Babylon on June 10th, 323 BC, Alexander the Great died at the age of
32, having conquered an empire stretching from modern Albania to eastern
Pakistan. The question of what (or who) killed the Macedonian king has never
been answered successfully, and even today new theories are constantly cropping
up in regards to one of history’s longest-running cold cases. The death of
Alexander poses a mystery that is, perhaps, insoluble, but nonetheless
irresistible; conspiracy buffs (naturally) have been speculating about it since
before the king’s body was even cold, but recently there has been an
extraordinary number of new accusers and new suspects. Fuel was added to the
fire by Oliver Stone’s Alexander,
released in 2004, a film that, whatever its artistic flaws, presents a
historically informed theory about who killed Alexander and why thanks to its
ending: Ptolemy, now Pharaoh of Egypt (and played by Anthony Hopkins), looks
back over the decades since his king and commander’s death and declares that “the
truth is, we did kill him. By silence, we consented, because we couldn’t go on”.
All
this matters in this context as Graham Phillips, the author of Alexander the Great: Murder in Babylon, thinks he’s
solved this ancient mystery, maintaining that that only strychnine could have
produced a death like Alexander’s, after having submitted the record of
Alexander’s symptoms to the Los Angeles County Regional Poison Center. Following
a twisting (at times, tortuous) trail of logic, Phillips tries to identify
Alexander’s murderer by finding out who had access to strychnine. The poisonous
plant is rare along Alexander’s route of march and could be harvested only in
high elevation regions of the subcontinent, like modern-day Pakistan. Not all
of Alexander’s retinue followed him into such areas, allowing Phillips to
eliminate potential suspects. He concludes that only one person who might have
had a motive to kill Alexander also had the means: Roxana, the first of the
king’s three wives. She had become enraged at Alexander (Phillips assumes) by
his two subsequent marriages to Persian princesses and killed him. This view of
Roxana as a latter-day Medea revives one popularized in The Rival Queens, or the Death of Alexander the Great, by the 17th
Century English tragedy Nathaniel Lee, but is not supported by evidence. After 2000+
years, it would appear that the trail has grown cold. With physical remains
lacking and written testimony ambiguous at best, the burden of proof in the
Alexander case falls heavily on circumstantial evidence, and much of this
presents a grave challenge to all conspiracy theories. Opponents of such
theories have long noted that Alexander himself, during the 10 or 12 days he
slid towards death, never gave any sign that he suspected poison, though he had
become quick to sniff out and punish traitors in his final years. He would
never have gone willingly to his death, nor would his enemies have allowed him
to linger so long if they had in fact acted against him. A slow decline would
allow him to order their executions.
To
assert that Alexander was poisoned one would have to admit that the job was
badly bungled. The same point could be made about what followed Alexander’s
death. The chaos and collapse in the succeeding decades looks nothing like the
result of a planned assassination. If the goal of the generals was to go home they
failed miserably; only one, Antipater, ever returned to Macedonia, and only
Ptolemy succeeded in gaining any measure of peace or security. Many of the
others continued fighting and killing each other. Given how central Alexander was
to the stability of their world, they had no reason in June 323 BC to expect
otherwise. Any plan to poison Alexander would have been fraught with perils,
especially for Macedonian warriors who had no experience with toxins.
Conspiracy theories have to assume that Alexander’s generals hated their
commander enough to risk everything. It is easier to see them in the way the
sources portray them: as a dedicated cadre of elite officers reliant for their
fortunes on the survival and success of their king. Thus it is easier, in the
end, to believe that Alexander died of disease, despite ingenious and
determined recent efforts to prove otherwise.
No comments:
Post a Comment