578
pages, Farrar, Straus & Giroux, ISBN-13: 978-0374113261
An
insight that never occurred to me about my Beloved Jane was brought forth by David
Nokes in his splendid biography of the Hampshire Novelist, Jane Austen: A Life, and it was this: for the majority of her life
she was not a novelist at all but rather a woman born into the lower ranks of
the landed gentry in England during one of her nation’s most trying and
dangerous times, the Napoleonic Wars; she was daughter, sister and aunt, concerned
with domestic duties, money (always) and finding a husband (sometimes). Any stories
she did write were strictly for familial entertainments and personal amusement,
never for publication. Her sojourn in urban Bath did not quash her authorial gifts
that a return to rural Hampshire restored; it was rather the considerable round
of dances, parties, entertaining, visiting, gossiping and so forth that kept
her occupied and distracted her from her (non-existent) role of writer. It wasn’t
until 1811, at the insistence of her ever-expanding brood of nieces and nephews
that her first book, Sense and
Sensibility, was published, and it was in 1815 that her last, Emma, was brought forth (Northanger Abbey and Persuasion were both posthumously published
in 1818). Four years. That’s it.
For
all that has been written about her, a biography of Jane Austen presents a
considerable challenge for contemporary biographers as there are gaping voids
in her life story that biographers have traditionally filled by relying on Austen’s
revisionary familial biographers – the above-mentioned nieces and nephews – who
created the mythically matronly and consummately proper “Aunt Jane” persona. In order to fill in the blanks of her life, Nokes scrupulously returned
to and reevaluated Austen’s surviving
letters, as well as those of any women and men even remotely associated with
her in order to narrate her life “as it was experienced at the time, not with
the detached knowingness of hindsight”. Thus, he intended to write a biography
without a preconceived idea of how the subject would ultimately be perceived – a
biography “written forwards”, in his words – which, stylistically speaking, functions
beautifully. Nokes creates a series
of snapshot-like scenes, ranging
from colonial India (where Austen’s
uncle worked) to the various parishes of rural England, making his biography
read rather like a Jane Austen novel. They allow for intense scrutiny of the moments
of Austen’s life about which reliable information remains, and for Nokes – who
is admirably committed to avoiding speculation – this format also facilitates
the occasionally necessary omission of periods in Jane’s life of which nothing
remains but falsehood. He freely admits that, in situations such as Harris Bigg-Wither’s
marriage proposal and Austen’s response,
“all we have are legends, anecdotes,
and rumours…[H]ints and whispers,
so often reproduced as facts, are little more than conjectures”. While frustrating
to the curious reader, these skips in time reflect Nokes’ sense of scholarly
responsibility: he would rather leave gaps in the record than cite speculation
as fact, as too many of his predecessors have done.
Nokes’
analyses of the major works are smoothly incorporated and consistently astute (the
evolution of Sense and Sensibility is
particularly insightful); in addition, his distinctive style provides an excellent
showcase for Nokes’ unimpeachable and meticulous research. His dedication to
the chronological structure contributes to another notable strength: with only
a handful of exceptions, Nokes resists the temptation to identify real people
in Austen’s life with the characters in her subsequent novels. This alone
separates him from the majority of his predecessors and assures the value of this
biography’s contribution to the field of Austen scholarship. On a broader
level, Nokes’ methodology reveals a marked departure from standard literary
biographical practice, and as such it merits praise for its originality and
ambition. However, some significant problems emerge, the most glaring of which
is the simple fact that readers will
inevitably and unfailingly view Jane Austen with the “knowingness of hindsight”. Scholars write
biographies of her because she is the
author of masterpieces, a fact which is inseparably associated with her name;
as such, the attempt to write a
forward-moving biography without the specific, preconceived aim of situating
and understanding her acts of literary creation seems, theoretically,
untenable. This flawed perspective results in what appears to be a complete
unwillingness to exclude any documented information, regardless of what it may
be ( I mean, c’mon: is it really relevant
to Austen fans that her sister Cassandra recommended rhubarb to her brother Henry
when his stomach ached?). Nokes
appears to include every documented
anecdote he finds as part of his plan to illuminate Austen’s life as thoroughly
as possible; one must admit that, even in the most historically significant of
lives, some unimportant events will occur. The endless listing of such details
only dulls the reader’s senses to the
point of rendering them scarcely able to cull the relevant from the superfluous.
Yet
for all that, upon completion of Nokes’ book even the most eager of Austen scholars
will surely feel satiated. In spite of its faults, Jane Austen: A Life demonstrates a remarkable amount of thoroughness,
caution, and responsibility, qualities which will surely establish Nokes among
the most definitive of Austen biographers.
No comments:
Post a Comment