286 pages, Houghton Mifflin, ISBN-13:
978-0395830857
Since
America won the Cold War, there has been great confusion over what principles
should guide our Foreign Policy. The options range from the isolationism of Pat
Buchanan to the interventionist nation-building of Bill Clinton and George W.
Bush. Anyone wishing to understand the ongoing arguments should read this
terrific book. McDougall's compelling thesis is that there is a fundamental
dichotomy in US Foreign Policy, with two competing doctrines each influenced by
four different themes. There is the Old Testament – or Promised Land – impulse,
which is based on four key traditions: Exceptionalism (focus on liberty at
home while avoiding entangling alliances); Unilateralism (as opposed to
isolationism); The American System (The Monroe Doctrine); Expansionism (Manifest
Destiny).
This
was the prevailing approach to foreign policy – designed to protect America's
liberty and independence from the outside world – until 1898 and the Spanish
American War, at which point a New Testament – or Crusader State – gained
ascendancy, likewise guided by four traditions: Progressive Imperialism (American
Progressives abroad); Liberal Internationalism (Wilsonianism); Containment (war
by other means); Global Meliorism (reforming other nations internal problems.
The
adoption of the New Testament policy marked the triumph of the “do-gooder impulse”
and represented America's desire to influence the rest of the world and try to
make it a "better" place. Given this context, we can see that
Buchanan and Bush are representatives of two great historic trends in American
thought; what remains is for us to decide between the two.
After
presenting the historic development of each of the eight traditions, McDougall
concludes with a chapter on whether each would serve us well now. The only New
Testament tradition that he sees any value in is Containment. In fact, he
treats Containment well throughout the book. It seems as if he's a little
overawed by George Kennan (the father of Containment). In particular, he gives
the policy credit for defeating the Soviet Union. While he does criticize the
price paid (huge debt, internal dissent, etc.), I believe that he overestimates
the policy. First of all, if containment did work, it took 36 years to do so
and that is simply too long. Second, it would seem that you have to consider
the Reagan Era policy to be quite different than what had come before,
especially the active support of counterrevolutionary movements in Soviet Bloc
countries (Afghanistan, Nicaragua, Angola). Generally, the discussion of how US
policy won the Cold War is somewhat weak.
But
his final conclusions, that we should return to the Old Testament – taking care
of our own internal problems; being prepared to act unilaterally, if at all;
remaining strong enough to deter challenges; and thereby, continuing to fulfill
our unique destiny – is cogent and extremely powerful. This is a pivotal text
for understanding our role in the world, past, present and future.
No comments:
Post a Comment