384
pages, Oxford University Press, ISBN-13: 978-0199775293
“Even
now the Roman World feels like a vast sandpit in which I can play…” says Greg
Woolf, Professor of Ancient History at the University of St Andrews and the
author in the preface to this work, and it is a pleasure to join him in the
box. Like ancient astrologers scanning the heavens for answers and warnings,
contemporary man studies Rome’s past for clues to the problems they face. Most
of us look for warnings in the end of the Roman Republic, or the Empire’s fall;
but after reading this superb analysis, to me the closest parallel to our times
is Rome in the 2nd Century BC. Like Rome, we have seen the
termination of older imperial states and, with our withdrawal, their
replacement with weaker, semi-chaotic successor states that often turn against
us. Other similarities are economic dislocation at home, with the decline in
economic viability of productive small producers, and the inward migration of
subject peoples which further displace said small producers. Internal politics
seem to encourage bitterness and hostility among the ruling classes as domestic
affairs become more chaotic and violent. Foreign policy is in disarray as
client states openly try to manipulate policy makers thru thinly disguised
bribes and gifts. Even an over-stretched citizen based military that was never
designed for conflicts that seem to last for generations in distant lands is
paralleled today.
This
is a fascinating analysis, which you don’t always have to agree with. I found
one minor error on page 274 where Antiochus III is mentioned as a Persian emperor.
His take on the current historical debate over the nature of the changes that
took place with the fall of the Roman Empire makes a lot of sense; while there
may have been “continuity and transformation” at the bottom of the social
scale, the change was catastrophic at the top and “Measured in terms of
territory, population, influence, and military power there is no doubt at all
about the fact of collapse. Ancients recognized this, and so should we.” He
gives no reason for the Empire’s fall, but believes the fact that no other
empire rapidly arose to succeed would argue against the fall being due to
systemic reasons – or were the emperors to blame?
This
is not a work for the novice, as it is truly speaking not a detailed history,
but rather an analytical work. It tells the whole story of the Roman Empire
from the beginning of the town of Rome until the fall of Constantinople
(although it really doesn't go until 1453 AD but ends in the early 700s AD when
it was in decline). The book does this at a very high level in terms of telling
the story of Rome, the overthrow of the Etruscan kings, the republic, the civil
wars (Caesar, Pompey, Octavian, etc.), the early empire and the late empire.
What is excellent about this book is the analysis of each segment of Rome's
history – why things occurred the way that they did. It accomplishes this using
primary sources and excellent secondary sources that evaluate these primary
sources. The book is at its best in its brief discussions of the latest
theories of Roman history. Although it can be dry at times due to the
analytical approach, this book is a must have for any reader interested in the
Roman Empire, its growth, the primary period, and its decline.
No comments:
Post a Comment