757
pages, Albert A. Knopf, Inc., ISBN-13: 978-0394529158
Last
week I reviewed Inside the Third Reich:
Memoirs by Albert Speer and mentioned that my opinion of this book changed
after I read Albert Speer: His Battle
with Truth by Gitta Sereny. Herein is my review of that book…
While
it is intriguing to speculate whether Speer knew or did not know about the
extermination of the Jews, that is only the smallest part of this vast work of
scholarship. Gitta Sereny came to the conclusion that Speer was neither moral
nor immoral, but rather “morally extinguished”, an ambiguous term at best, but
from what I read in Speer’s books and from what Sereny reveals in this one, I
take it to mean something fairly simple: Speer was aware of people being
imprisoned and killed, but really didn't pay much attention because he was too
busy with his career, i.e. he noticed Jews being lined up at the Berlin train
station to be taken somewhere, but didn’t have the inclination or the time to
find out why or where; he noticed that his boss had started a war, but was too
busy to wonder whether the war was justified; his boss Der Führer ordered him to assume leadership of armaments production
for the war, but he discovered that armaments production was accomplished
largely by slaves who died in great numbers at their work (perhaps he’d heard
of work areas where very little work was done and very, very large numbers of
people died, of causes unrelated to work; perhaps he did not).
Of
his repentance after the war there can be little doubt: he quarrels in Spandau
with the other Nazis over whether they did anything wrong; he is mocked by one
of his closest former Nazi friends for his “public mea culpas”; he speaks with a chaplain in Spandau about his desire
to make himself a “different man”; he exchanges letters with Rabbi Robert Geis,
a tremendously moving encounter; and the fact that he would sit down for
numerous interviews with Sereny, an author of books on death camps, speaks of
his consciousness of the crimes he was associated with, and his desire to
confront them, and herein is Sereny’s greatest contribution to what we know of
this man, as she describes just how Albert Speer was able to live with
accepting guilt for the Holocaust, but without actually acknowledging that he knew about the Holocaust during his
tenure with Hitler. While this is a subtle distinction it was one necessary for
Speer’s survival.
There
is no attempt to white wash Speer’s role in supporting Hitler. Given his
position within hierarchy of the Third Reich – especially as Armaments Minister
and his not inconsiderable contribution to the war effort – his role in the
entrenched slavery that was part of Hitler’s Regime and his intelligence he
could have hardly not known about the crimes that he at least enabled. However,
for a person to hold himself responsible for these monstrous crimes and to
still go on in any ordinary way would be next to impossible; the two are
mutually exclusive. This is especially true given the fact that Speer was no
monster; that he was not evil man, but only participated in evil acts. Sereny
is no apologist for Speer, but rather, when necessary, a harsh critic. The fact
that Speer enabled Hitler to continue his campaign against humanity, and for so
long shut his eyes to Nazi crimes, cannot be excused. However, since Speer was
no Himmler or Goebbels, it can (perhaps) be understood.