688 pages, HarperCollins,
ISBN-13: 978-0060192471
A blurb
on the dust jacket for Human
Accomplishment: The Pursuit of Excellence in the Arts and Sciences, 800 B.C. to
1950 suggests that it is for the general reader, but this is simply not so;
rather, Charles Murray’s book is for that minority who can be defined as a
discriminating readership. It is not an easy book: to quote author Charles Murray
himself, his “Human Accomplishment describes
what we [that is, society] have achieved, provides some tools for thinking
about how it has been done, and celebrates our continuing common quest” (Oh. Is
that all). It might be said that our
common quest is to discover truth and beauty. Perhaps this book can best be
described as a kind of “Lifetime Achievement Award for Excellence in the Arts
and Sciences” as determined by experts in the various fields in which these
great people worked. Some of the winners will be surprising, others not so
much; for instance, in the combined sciences, the man who experts think had the
most important contribution was Sir Isaac Newton, while in Western philosophy Aristotle
beat Plato by almost ten percentage points. The giants of Western music are
Beethoven and Mozart (who basically tied for first place), and in Western Art the
most significant figure is Michelangelo.
But just
how were these giants of Western Art and Thought determined? Well, I’ll tell
ya: Murray did a statistical analysis across both English-printed and
foreign-printed textbooks in the arts and sciences, calculated who the most
frequently cited were and the amount of pages that were devoted to those
figures, and determined that these were the dominant figures who emerged. It’s
a pretty cool concept, you must admit, and it makes for a pretty fun read (it’s
also difficult to argue with the results). And it took someone like Charles Murray
to come up with this mind-boggling task, being the gutsy social scientist that
he is: back in 1994 he co-wrote the excellent The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life with
Richard Herrnstein, and the onslaught of controversy from our Politically Correct
betters virtually killed Herrnstein (he died not long after the release of the
book); but Murray has kept on trucking, and a decade later released another
Politically Incorrect bombshell with this outstanding book. Being aware of his
topic’s controversial nature, Murray spends nearly as much time explaining his
statistical methodology as he does analyzing results, and after reading Murray’s
exhaustive disclosure you’d be forgiven for feeling overwhelmed by his data
gathering effort…and, you’d be hard pressed to think how a researcher could have
been more objective in this endeavor.
No comments:
Post a Comment