322 pages, University
of California Press, ISBN-13: 978-0520059139
Morris
Rossabi is an American historian and Senior Scholar and Adjunct Professor at
Columbia University and Distinguished Professor of History at Queens College;
he was also given an honorary doctorate from the National University of
Mongolia for his work on the history of Mongolia, China and East Asia, of which
this book, Khubilai Khan: His Life and
Times, forms a part (and don’t be like Spell-Check; it is spelled “Khubilai”
and not “Kublai” throughout). Rossabi and all other historians seeking to
review the history of the Khans face a difficult task as the Mongols had no
written language, and, so, there are no histories of the Mongols written by the
Mongols. The sources available to the historians are Confucian Chinese and
Muslim Persian (principally) as well as Shinto Japanese and Nestorian Christian
(secondary). As will be readily noted, these sources were recorded with points
of view held by peoples subjugated by the Mongols, hardly an ideal situation
for an historian seeking disinterested facts. As will also be readily noted,
this is not a history intended for the general public. Oh, it’s straightforward
enough – Rossabi organizes his topics into chapters, opens each by telling you
what he’s going to tell you, tells you what he intended to tell you, and then
closes each by telling you what he told you – but in seeking to present a broad
sweep of Khubilai’s times we get a series of not-always well-connected stories:
military stories, Khubilai’s governance stories, tax-collecting stories,
stories describing the theater, stories describing Khubilai’s efforts to create
a written language for the Mongols, and so on. Rossabi struggles with his
diverse sources and their conflicting points of view, frequently warning the
reader that his descriptions are guesses and that he weighed the differing
points of view of his sources in order report what Rossabi regarded as the
likely truth. This is no bad thing; after all, history is always a set of
events sifted by the values of the historian and the richness and perspectives
of the sources, and Rossabi’s history of Khubilai Khan has the marks of careful
workmanship, given the sources available to him.
No comments:
Post a Comment