397 pages, Vintage, ISBN-13: 978-0394704159
The Banquet Years: The Origins of the Avant-Garde in
France, 1885 to World War I by Roger Shattuck – an American writer who was best
known for his books on French literature, art and music of the 20th
Century – is his history of La Belle Époque, and what a history it is,
too. This is one of my favorite eras in history, and to have a masterful
historian such as Shattuck write this history is a rare treat, indeed. There
are few other persons with Shattuck’s breadth of knowledge who could have
accomplished this feat: the man’s working knowledge of French music, poetry,
painting and theater were all impressive, but his familiarity with the
behind-the-scenes scandals and drama that affected their development gives his
study a legitimacy that few other works can equal. Shattuck’s understanding of
what the French avant-garde represented wasn’t a style, per se,
but rather “a way of life, both dedicated and frivolous” whose significance was
not to be found in the work of the most celebrated talents but, rather, in the
aspirations of original talents that hadn’t yet been recognized. As the man
himself said:
Only by cutting below the most
prominent figures is one likely to find men both representative of the era and
significant in their own right. Their artistic identities are most discernible
against their background rather than removed form it into a new context of
individual greatness. Henri Rousseau, Erik Satie, Alfred Jarry, Guillaume
Apollinaire: is this grouping less arbitrary than any other? They make, in
fact, a singular team. Rousseau, a true artisan, painted with a combination of
insight and awkwardness that earned for him double standing as both modern and
primitive artist. Satie’s music partakes of the same simplicity, yet he lived
in a series of scandals on the forefront of the artistic scene in Paris. Jarry’s
play ‘Ubu Roi’ made him notorious at twenty-three, and within ten years he put
himself in the grave with overwork, poverty, and drink. Before he died during
the closing hours of World War I, Apollinaire had written some of the finest
lyric poetry of the century and had assumed the leadership of Paris
avant-garde. All four had colorful, significant careers, careers that might
separately be ranked in the second magnitude of the epoch. Why, then, do they
convey, in combination, the interplay of forces that steadily pushed the arts
toward what Apollinaire called the New Spirit? The reasons are simple. Their
entwined careers in Paris exactly span the period 1885-1918 and suggest a unity
in artistic conviction and practice that is less clearly expressed in any
single figure or in a general survey of the era. Chronologically and in spirit
they set its limits. In addition, their originality and persistence worked upon
more stable artists and obliged them to take into account the most audacious
and sometimes foolish aspirations of the age.
I apologize for the long-ass quote, but sometimes its better just to let the author speak for himself rather than butcher his ideas. Speaking of which, one may legitimately ask – especially if one is French – how it is that this definitive chronicle of the French avant-garde came to be written by ce maudit américain. Perhaps, sometimes, it takes an outsider to properly discern things that are hidden or overlooked by insiders. Furthermore, while The Banquet Years was originally written way the hell back in 1968, it still wafts through one’s mind like a cool summer breeze, what with its many deft analytical anecdotes that do more to enlighten even the most dedicated historian of the age as any turgid academic history could. This is true, as well, of the thumbnail sketches of his principal subjects: the post-impressionist painter Henri Rousseau; the composer and pianist Erik Satie; the symbolist writer Alfred Jarry; and the poet, playwright, short story writer and novelist Guillaume Apollinaire – four outcasts who were barely noticed by the pointy-head longhairs of their time who nevertheless ushered-in 20th Century modernism (for good and ill).
Can a 400-page scholarly review of French avant-garde artistic achievements legitimately be called a literary classic? It can, if it’s Roger Shattuck’s The Banquet Years.
No comments:
Post a Comment