480
pages, Alfred A. Knopf, ISBN-13: 978-0375408984
Two
of history’s most famous queens – one known for her unexpected and remarkable
greatness; the other for her inexplicably poor judgment and bad luck – are the
subject of Elizabeth and Mary: Cousins,
Rivals, Queens. But was their famous rivalry inevitable? Was Elizabeth
always the popular, talented, dominant one while Mary remained in her shadow?
Jane Dunn asks these questions, and I was surprised (and pleased) by some of
her answers.
The
first part of the book is essentially a point-by-point comparison of the two
queens, detailing their very different youths and explaining how they would
influence the women in later years. Essentially, Mary had a huge sense of
entitlement, was overconfident in her own power and security, and was a much
more “traditional” woman (and Queen) of her day. Elizabeth, whose childhood was
punctuated by dramatic changes of fortune, had a much more acute sense of how
tenuous her position was, and how much she depended on the good will of her
people to maintain power. Dunn does beat the Mary-as-charming-but-spoiled and
Bess-as-brilliant-control-freak comparison into us a bit, but it is a good way
of looking at the very different natures of these two women. Her book isn’t a
full biography of either queen; rather it’s a look at the intersection between
them: their relationship with each other, their competition, rivalry, and
common causes. As such it's a fascinating look at a unique time in European
history, the so-called “Age of Queens”.
Posterity-wise, Mary got the short end of the
stick. History will always remember her as Elizabeth’s paler shadow, a major
annoyance and minor queen who had no one but herself to blame for her tragic
end. Although Dunn does occasionally (perhaps unavoidably) slip into
Mary-bashing and Bess-worship, on the whole she does a good job pointing out
that that wasn't always the case – and, had a few things gone differently, we
would paint a very different portrait of the two cousins. Her Mary and Elizabeth
are fully human: flaws, quirks, charms, and all. It’s the best way to explain
the convoluted relationship between the two, and it provides a lot of useful
character insight into all other aspects of these Queens as well (I do wish
Dunn had gone further into the possibility that Mary was bipolar; it’s a
fascinating hypothesis, and it would explain quite a lot). Mary's end is, I felt,
too rushed; 20 years are covered in a handful of pages and the account of the
execution itself offers nothing new. But until that point, I thoroughly enjoyed
this provocative and inspiring portrait of two very different women whom
circumstances thrust into such fierce competition.
No comments:
Post a Comment