416
pages, Dorset Press, ISBN-13: 978-0880296670
Hannibal: The
General from Carthage
is a standard biography of the Carthaginian military leader. The writing is
fine and the story line (if one can use that term for a non-fiction book) is
interesting: despite an (apparently) unending series of tactical and
operational successes, Hannibal loses the war against Rome, due primarily to
strategic considerations outside of his control (i.e., Carthage should never
have taken on this war unless they had changed their approach substantially).
There are lessons here for modern generals (sometimes, despite having the
smartest leaders, the best trained and most experienced troops, cutting-edge
military technology, the wealthiest society in the known world supporting you,
and pretty good luck (to boot), it’s just not enough) – well, I could go on
here for a long time, but will refrain from doing so. Although perfectly
enjoyable, the book suffers from two major shortcomings: The sources used on
Hannibal’s life are only Roman, but this is because there simply are no other
sources of information. The author recognizes this explicitly, and tries to balance
the Roman accounts with “common sense” interpretations and a modern
understanding of the situation. Also, there is an absence of sufficient maps. Repeatedly
throughout the book, the author uses phrases such as “Hannibal marched to (this
town), then to (that town), while the Romans marched to (someplace else)”;
these towns generally don’t appear in modern atlases, and there is no further
description in the book (is it on the coast? in the mountains? north?
south" east? west?). Without any additional guidance, this is simply
useless information. One is tempted to believe that the author has read this
information in source materials, but never bothered to discover what it
actually meant (could this be true? Nah). It’s more likely that the publisher
was unwilling to spring for a couple of pennies per book to provide the maps
(or that the author couldn’t be bothered to spend the couple of weeks necessary
to get them included). In any case, it’s a shame, and detracts from an
otherwise adequate book.
No comments:
Post a Comment