432 pages, Simon &
Schuster, ISBN-13: 978-0671242961
Witness to Power: The Nixon Years by John Ehrlichman is a fascinating depiction
of the Nixon Administration as seen by one the many pros who ran the White
House under strict instruction from a master politician. As President Nixon’s
assistant for domestic affairs, Ehrlichman was known for his fierce loyalty and
combative style. He helped formulate the President’s domestic political agenda
which included a plan for a guaranteed annual income to fight poverty and wage
and price controls to limit inflation (wait, this is a Republican Administration?!). At the same time he directed the
White House “plumbers” who, with the purported mission of preventing leaks to
unfriendly reporters, used underhanded methods to discredit Nixon’s (many) political
foes. The ideal manager, Ehrlichman rarely contested what his chief ordered –
like when he directed burglars to break into the office of the psychiatrist of
Daniel Ellsberg, the defense analyst who leaked the Pentagon Papers to the
press, or when he encouraged FBI Director L. Patrick Gray to destroy documents
taken from Howard Hunt’s White House safe that outlined plans to sabotage the
Democrats. Amid revelations of the cover-up, Nixon forced Ehrlichman to resign (along
with White House chief of staff H. R. Haldeman) on April 30th, 1973.
He was later convicted of conspiracy to obstruct justice and perjury in the
Watergate case and of conspiracy in the Ellsberg case and served 18 months in
prison. Throughout his time in the White House Ehrlichman time and again did
his best to support and to carry out the wishes of the President, occasionally
arguing with him, sure, but ultimately always ready when push came to shove to affect
Nixon’s desires. In Witness to Power
he claims, not surprisingly, that he was unfairly asked to fall on his sword
over Watergate and, good soldier that he was, did so, although he considered
himself one of the least culpable in the Nixon circle.
This is
one of the few books about the period which does not depict the President as an
obsessive paranoid but instead as a truly tragic figure capable at times of
greatness, but ultimately undone by his associates, all of whom believed,
rightly or wrongly, that they were carrying out Nixon’s clear wishes. They may
very well have been. Ehrlichman was cool, kept his distance and his objectivity,
and was sacrificed (or so he was told; and so he says) for the common good. Ehrlichman
was never known for having a sharp wit, a shortcoming obvious in his writing.
However, his justification for his confrontational approach to the Senate
Watergate Committee rings hollow and (justifiably) he clearly feels bitterness
towards the President, who was pardoned for any crimes he might have committed,
escaped Watergate scott-free (having to quit your job and head into a cushy retirement
because you did illegal things isn’t exactly cruel and unusual punishment)
while many of his underlings, carrying out his orders and policies, went to
jail (and as you might have guessed, he’s not a fan of John Dean, either). I
think Ehrlichman is more culpable than he relates in the book, and he excuses
many of Nixon’s actions (who, remember, demanded the resignation of hundreds of
his employees after being re-elected in 1972: nice reward for hard work); Ehrlichman
dismisses this with the same gravitas as if the President didn’t like his salad
dressing and sent the order back. But I also think he did work hard on domestic
policy issues and did the President’s bidding, which earned him jail time and the
loss of his law license. This is a good look at one man’s experience working
for the Nixon White House.
No comments:
Post a Comment