736
pages, Basic Books, ISBN-13: 978-0465013692
Political
commentator Kevin Phillips has always seen unfolding events and emerging trends
with remarkable clarity. Taking a break from contemporary politics Phillips
has, at first glance, written a book about three wars – the English Civil War,
the American Revolution and the American Civil War. However, The Cousins’ Wars: Religion, Politics, Civil
Warfare, and the Triumph of Anglo-America reads less like a scholarly
analysis of English and American history than a graduate student’s thesis. His
basic argument is that these three wars were all battles in the same civil war:
Roundhead vs. Cavalier; Merchant vs. Noble; Yankee vs. Virginian; Whig vs. Tory;
North vs. South – the names might change but the opponents were essentially the
same. According to Phillips, the origins of the struggles lay in geographic,
religious, and socio-economic divisions in England.
On
the one side were East Anglian Puritans, low-church protestant tradesmen and
merchants, both those who stayed in England and those who emigrated to New
England. On the other side were the bishops, high church Anglicans,
aristocrats, and other loyalists, including lower-class foot-soldiers from the
northern border regions of England who migrated to the inland, mountainous
regions of the South and mid-Atlantic North America, while their upper-class
allies became the Virginian colonial elite. Phillips evidence is strong: the
towns and communities which opposed the King in the English Civil War and sent
colonists to the new world also tended to oppose the King in the Revolution,
and wanted to maintain America during the American Civil War. If all politics
is local, as Tip O’Neill said, than the battle-lines of these three wars were
always drawn by local matters: religion, economics, and geography. Thus, these
wars led to the triumph of the Anglo-Saxon world of England and America, which
has in turn been a blessing upon the world today.
The
freshness of Phillips’ thesis for an American audience comes from his attention
to the English Civil War of the mid-17th Century. From that
perspective, the main conflict of the Revolutionary War was not between Britain
and the United States, but between old enemies that cut across national
boundaries within the English-speaking world. Then, following that conflict
through the U.S. Civil War give a fresh perspective on a war that is in need of
one.
If
you are fairly well versed in the American Revolution and American Civil War,
this is a good book because it views those conflicts from an entirely new angle
– however, I would advise against reading this book if you know little about
those conflicts as there is no narrative of the events here; Phillips assumes
you know the basics. It is a sympathetic account, as Phillips clearly approves
of Anglo dominance, but the book is worth reading even for those who don’t.
No comments:
Post a Comment