464
pages, Basic Books, ISBN-13: 978-0465027231
Mr.
Jefferson gave HRH George III quite a scolding in the Declaration of
Independence, but one can’t come away from George
III: A Personal History by Christopher Hibbert without warming to much-maligned
monarch. So much attention has been paid lately to the madness of George III
that it is refreshing to be forced to ponder on his alleged goodness to which
tribute was paid on many occasions before 1820 when already mad he celebrated
the jubilee of his accession. In 1763 his 25th birthday had been
celebrated at the Queen’s command by fireworks and music by Handel. In 1810 the
celebrations were public, popular and not confined to one place. Lord Berkeley
had written a year earlier about the King’s “great popularity…the mass of the
people look up to his good moral character and to his age and to a comparison
with his sons”. “Good moral character” was deemed to be a main explanation of
George’s popularity, obvious both at his death in 1820 and his apotheosis ten
years before, yet cartoonists had not always accepted the version of Georgian values
that the King presented (often in confused fashion) and he was by no means
uniformly popular at all points in his long reign. He stood out by comparison,
however, not only with his sons but with his brothers, and in 1810, at least,
because he was “father of the people” in time of war when loyalty was at a
premium. His madness, well-covered by Hibbert, helped him too. He not only
benefited from compassion but gained in compassion himself. When mad and
believing himself to be already dead, he decided on occasion to wear mourning “in
memory of George III, for he was a good man”. That was his own perspective.
Hibbert
brings the routines of George III’s court back to life. He deals with the
politics of the reign less fully, while noting that the King’s dislike of
politicians as a group was as strong as his dislike of the whole medical tribe.
He did not trust either the knowledge or the commitment to service of either
group, convinced that he was living in a most profligate age. He believed
without thought that old ways were good ways without always knowing what the
old ways had been. Another feature of his character that doubtless added to his
subjects’ appreciation of him was that he disliked travel; he never once
crossed the Channel and, even in Britain (a term to which, as Linda Colley has
shown, he gave new meaning) he never went to Wales or to Ireland and probably
never to Scotland, either. Particularly interesting are the glimpses one gets
of everyday life: “terracing” (evening walks during the summer) by the Royal
Family, the King’s pleasure in interactions with common folks, suggestions of a
sincere Christian faith, and pithy (sometimes snide) remarks by or about one
person or the other. One feels sympathy while reading about the mental illness
that claimed his later years. 18th Century/American Revolution
enthusiasts should enjoy this fuller picture of the “Other George” across the
pond.
Hibbert
has chapters that deal with the American Revolution which are reasonably good
summaries, given his focus in the book. The only real aspect I did not like in
the book was that, after the American Revolution, we know almost nothing about
the effect of the larger world on the British nation. The major events on the
continent like the French Revolution and Napoleon are barely touched upon. It would
have been out of the book’s focus to give any detailed account of these as
related to England; this is not at all a political biography. But I do wish
that Hibbert had chapters at least summarizing these events and their effect on
England. Granted, this is a personal biography but surely the King’s chief
ministers, with whom he consulted in the long stretches of time when he was
stable, had their hands full with these issues. For the reader it would be
important context for the reign of this monarch. I thought the last third of
the book was so intensely focused on the King, his illness, and his family that
I was missing what was happening to the nation around him at that time. This
biography marks a turn in English history that began a hundred years before
George. Though George tried in the first part of his life, he and later
monarchs no longer had the power to direct the nation's policies in a way that
existed before the Glorious Revolution. So it makes sense that a biography of a
king could be much more personal and less political. This book is thoroughly
enjoyable reading and Hibbert is an excellent writer. But I do wish he would
have included a little more context about events after 1789 that changed the
world and that had an important effect on the direction of English history.
No comments:
Post a Comment