500
pages, Free Press, ISBN-13: 978-0029259658
Thomas
C. Reeves’ A Question of Character: A
Life of John F. Kennedy is a fine book that lays bare the many myths of “Camelot”
that the Kennedy clan and its sycophants have tried to perpetuate since the day
he was shot. The title of the book says it all: a question of character. This
is one author’s attempt to look at the political life of President John F.
Kennedy before and during his time in the White House. It details the
differences in what the spin is and the private life that is described as being
close to Hugh Hefner’s. We also get a very detailed (and somewhat troubling) view
of the constant controls his father, Joe Kennedy, had over JFK throughout his
career (not that comforting given the dubious reputation of Joe). Today, few
young Americans even know who John F. Kennedy was because less than a handful
of his positive accomplishments had any lasting significance. Like William
McKinley, the fact that an assassin cut short Kennedy’s life and presidency
might be all that Americans recall about him 50 years from now. More than 50
years after Kennedy’s death, the full extent of his life-long medical problems
is still being withheld from the American people and conservative scholars, and
Reeves recounts many of those problems.
Kennedy
essentially launched the Vietnam War, despite what his many sycophants would
have us believe, and his secretary of defense, Robert McNamara, was the
architect of that lost conflict and the enormous suffering that it produced.
More than 50,000 brave Americans died and it impaled this nation’s honor on the
horns of a tragedy that still haunts policy makers and citizens alike. Even
before Vietnam, Kennedy was responsible for the failed Bay of Pigs invasion of
Cuba, where Fidel Castro humiliated him completely; this led going on 6 decades
worth of enslavement for the Cuban people. The Cuban Missile Crisis, or Kennedy’s
confrontation with the Soviet Union, might have given rise to a global nuclear war.
His reckless affairs with women were only outdone by his irresponsible and
dangerous relationships with mobsters such as Chicago crime boss Sam Giancana.
These two character flaws merged when both Kennedy and Giancana had sexual
liaisons with Judith Exner, who was used as their go-between. Indeed, it is
doubtful whether Kennedy would have become president in 1960 if the Mob had not
helped him in Illinois and West Virginia (something that Giancana claimed
credit for). Kennedy was the son of a bootlegger, and the apple did not fall
far from the tree, with respect to the three Kennedy brothers who entered national
politics.
John F. Kennedy was not someone to look up to,
much less deify. Many of us came to that conclusion reluctantly, years ago,
with a sense of sadness rather than anger. Like the potentate in Hans Christian
Andersen's fairy tale, “The Emperor's New Clothes”, the myth about Kennedy and
his feet of clay have become clear for all to see with the passage of time.
Greatness is often achieved in times of war, and Kennedy never won the war with
Cuba, much less the Vietnam War that he started, nor did he win the Cold War – which
Reagan won. Reeves does observe that JFK was beginning to grow into the office
by the time of his death, but stops short of predicting a glorious Kennedy
legacy had the man lived. It was far from a given that JFK could have won
re-election in 1964, and Reeves knows this. Kennedy was a tragic Shakespearean
figure who may be forgotten and consigned to the dust heap of history, in no
small part because of the question of character that Reeves described
brilliantly in his terrific book.
No comments:
Post a Comment