384
pages, Walker & Company, ISBN-13: 978-0802716705
There
were times when I was reading The Lady
Queen: The Notorious Reign of Joanna I, Queen of Naples, Jerusalem, and Sicily
by Nancy Goldstone when I forgot that Queen Joanna was actually the subject of
this biography; very often Goldstone embarks on some genealogical or
socio-political excursion in the book and Joanna fades into the background,
only to emerge several pages later to remind the reader that she is supposedly
the central figure of the book. In all fairness, as the author noted, primary
Neapolitan material on Joanna I’s reign is very nearly non-existent, so it
becomes mighty hard to examine the life and character of Joanna herself.
Instead, we get to read about the Battle of Poitiers, the war for the crown of
Castile, various machinations in the papal court of Avignon, and the
subjugation of truculent Hungarian nobles by King Carobert. All well and good,
but it does not really make for a good biography. Perhaps it would have been
better to have re-drafted this of a history of the region with some emphasis on
Joanna I.
Of
course, Goldstone’s Feminist orientation makes a regional history somewhat
problematic, since she wishes to put Joanna in the historical pantheon
alongside women such as Elizabeth I of England, or Eleanor of Aquitaine. There
is probably a very good case to be made for this; after all, one does not survive
invasions, rebellion, civil war, and outbreaks of the plague and go on to rule
for almost 40 years without having a certain amount of administrative ability
and political acumen. However, the documentation just isn’t there, and so
inevitably Joanna shifts into the mode of supporting character, again and
again. Additionally, there certainly is a case to be made that Goldstone is
overly slanted in favor of Joanna. Obviously, Lajos I of Hungary had a very
legitimate claim to the Neapolitan throne as his father was totally screwed out
of his rightful inheritance and his brother was murdered (with the possible
acquiescence of his queen). Lajos had quite good reasons to invade Italy and
reclaim what he considered to be his by birthright, but one always gets the
impression that Joanna is always the victim here (also, the trial for murder,
which is emphasized on the book cover and in the introduction, is barely discussed
in the book itself. What’s up with that? I’m sure that the Vatican archives
must have a reasonable amount of documentation on this, so why is there so
little detail? I truly don't understand how the trial can built up and then be
dealt with in such an anticlimactic way).
So why read this book? Because the life of
Joanna I was a soap opera of a story which makes for pretty good reading (mostly).
Some of this stuff is unnecessarily confusing (like the genealogical morass of
the first 70 pages or so). There is no reason to refer to everyone as “Louis”
or “Charles” here; at one point Goldstone observes that she refers to Joanna’s
niece (also Joanna) as the French “Jeanne” so as to avoid confusion. Why not
refer to Louis I of Hungary as Lajos, as he is usually known? Louis, Lajos,
Ludovico – there are ways to help the reader keep referring back the
genealogies every other page. Eventually, the reader emerges from the thicket
and the book moves along at a pretty decent pace. Then we get to read about
treachery and betrayal and what appears to a thoroughly dysfunctional,
blood-soaked family. Ye gods, I would almost rather be a peasant during this
time period as there seems to be nothing good about being at the top of the
heap. The twists and turns never seem to stop, and finally, one crazy pope
succeeds in bringing a turbulent reign to an end.
No comments:
Post a Comment