480
pages, Viking, ISBN-13: 978-0670021413
It
is February 1945, and the leaders of the Allied Powers – Franklin Delano
Roosevelt, 32nd President of the United States of America; Winston
Leonard Spencer-Churchill, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom of Great
Britain and Northern Ireland; and Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin, Dictator of the
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics – arrive at Yalta, a resort city on the
south coast of the Crimean Peninsula surrounded by the Black Sea. As the Second
World War was still going on, the three decided to meet in the south of the
Crimea, a place of luxury that had known war before, perhaps the most famous being
the Crimean War of the 19th Century. The three leaders were to
decide the fate of the world in a limited number of days, and among the many
issues discussed were the fate of Germany, the question of Russia’s entrance in
the war against Japan, the redrawing of Eastern European borders, particularly
those of Poland. Yalta has always a controversial subject which divided the
historians: on the one hand, there were those who claim that Western interests
were sacrificed because Churchill and Roosevelt wanted to pacify Stalin; on the
other hand, there were those who claimed the opposite; namely, that everything
was done to achieve a lasting balance of power.
Yalta: The Price
of Peace
by S. M. Plokhy convincingly dispels the first myth. Drawing on
newly-discovered documents locked-away in the former Soviet archives, the
thesis of the book is very simple: the Western leaders did all that could be
done and achieved the best possible results within that period of time. Published
and unpublished documents and diaries also confirm this thesis, and S.M. Plokhy
quotes extensively from the diaries of many of the participants – big wigs such
as General George Catlett Marshall, Jr., the American Chief of Staff of the
United States Army; Robert Anthony Eden, 1st Earl of Avon and the
British Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs; Vyacheslav
Mikhailovich Molotov, the Soviet People’s Commissar for Foreign Affairs; and Churchill
himself, along with other, lesser players, such as Roosevelt’s daughter Anna Roosevelt
Boettiger and even Churchill’s doctor. Plokhy’s new findings confirm that the
Russians were extremely resolute to establish control (if not mastery) over
their Western neighbors, with Poland as the key player. To be precise, after
Yalta, each side remained suspicious about the other’s intentions; Yalta did
not cause the Cold War, the Cold War came afterwards.
The
problem pointed out by the author at the very beginning of the book concerns
the absence of an official conference record which could have settled the
controversy; instead, we get a lot of quotations from memoirs or notes taken
during those eight fateful days. The author is very good at conveying to the
reader the atmosphere which prevailed at the various meetings and does not
spare even the tiniest details, thus giving us a feeling of actually being
there, seeing, hearing and attending the meetings. His analysis of the various
phases and issues is extremely good and helpful in understanding what went on
because he includes the broader panoramic picture of everything. To give just
an example, when he discusses the Far Eastern question (which was to settle the
terms of Russia’s entrance in battle against the Japanese), Plokhy provides an
extensive background to the relations between Russia and Japan, starting from
the 19th Century onwards, including details about the Russo-Japanese
War in 1904-1905. The motivations, thoughts, and actions of the Big Three and their
aides are well illustrated, military and political manoeuvers are discussed in
detail, and he provides a balanced and realistic look at the debates which went
on during the final days of the conference (even some menu contents are
described for the curious reader). The last two parts of the book examine the
high expectations following the Yalta conference and the crises in the
East-West relations that followed FDR’s death. This sorrowful event was the end
of cooperation with the USSR.
The
epilogue is an exceptional analysis of the Yalta agreements, absolving both
Roosevelt and Churchill of any mistakes; the Soviet Union had its own reasons
to be satisfied with the results, because its power status has been recognized.
Professor Plokhy then asks: could the Western Allies have done better at Yalta?
The first answer that comes to mind is, of
course they could have. The problem was that both Churchill and FDR viewed
the postwar world through different lenses: Roosevelt was interested in global
supremacy, while Churchill, in contrast, was interested more in Europe and in
the control of the Mediterranean, which was essential to the continued existence
of the British Empire; thus, from Churchill’s point of view, Stalin was a
potential enemy and not an ally. Both Churchill and FDR were committed to
prevent the communization of Eastern Europe. Yalta: The Price of Peace is first-rate history, and though I haven’t
read any competing works, it is difficult for me to believe that any might be
better for the general reader.
No comments:
Post a Comment