544
pages, Hyperion, ISBN-13: 978-0786867523
This
is the second of Simon Schama’s A History
of Britain trilogy. This volume begins promisingly by borrowing from Conrad
Russell’s important argument concerning the causes of the English Civil War.
Russell placed considerable importance on the existence of “multiple kingdoms”,
each of which exhibited its own set of interests during the early to mid-17th
Century; ultimately, these interests combined with Scottish and Irish
rebellions to push the British Isles into bloody civil war. Although the
multiple kingdom argument might have been used as a starting point for a
history explaining interactions between these kingdoms, Schama spends the
remainder of his book retelling tried and true stories of English high
politics. It is true that readers learn about Stuart efforts to create a
British identity in the early 17th Century, the Darien scheme, the
Glencoe Massacre, the Battle of the Boyne, and the 1715 and 1745 Jacobite
rebellions, but Scotland and Ireland are otherwise missing from this book (apparently,
as far as Schama is concerned, Wales was entirely integrated into England by
this point, an argument that many Welsh historians would disagree with).
Although these events are exceptionally important, they remain but a few
chapters in a long relationship.
Just
as a truly “British” dynamic is missing from the book, so, too, is any
substantial recognition that British history constitutes more than high
politics. Social and cultural developments are also extremely important; unfortunately,
the social history covered here is limited to interesting accounts of
prostitution in 18th Century London, alcohol consumption, and the
growing popularity of tea and sugar. The infamous Black Acts are also
mentioned, but Schama’s treatment is limited to elite motives for the growing
number of capital offenses on the statute books and the growing importance of
landed wealth under Walpole. There is nothing incorrect in Schama’s treatment,
but in some ways it misses the point by failing to acknowledge that 18th
Century Britain was at least as divided by class as it was by national identity
(if national identity is even the right term). Class was an important factor
standing in the way of the development of a British identity, a factor that
should not be limited to a few pages (indeed, if “modernization” theorists are
correct in linking the industrial revolution to the development of nationalism,
then class should be an essential topic of discussion).
All
this having been said, it is important to note that Schama has not attempted to
write a scholarly history of the British Isles. His book was written as a
companion to a multi-part television history of Britain (as stated in my review
of Volume I) and so limits itself to well-known stories that make for good
television. Most readers/viewers probably do not care very much about British
versus English history, or even the role of social and cultural history in its
development; I imagine that most want to be entertained and to learn something
along the way. Schama’s book certainly meets such criteria. Perhaps as a result
of its intended popular audience, Schama does not include footnotes; this
provides a considerable headache for those interested in the sources from which
he has drawn his stories. At various points Schama tells tales of poisoned
enemas, hemorrhoids suffering generals, and other behind the scenes dramas (this
reader, for one, was interested in learning more about where the author had
found these stories). More troubling, Schama borrows arguments from scholars
like Linda Colley and Conrad Russell yet, while both are listed in the
bibliography, they are never listed in the text as the originators of the ideas
being presented. Footnotes would assure these scholars the credit they richly
deserve. To his credit, Schama’s book is entertaining, readable, and fun, to
say nothing of the numerous beautiful color illustrations; amateur history
buffs will find much to enjoy when reading it and glancing through the
pictures, the facts presented are generally accurate and the stories told often
fascinating – but scholars interested in learning more about the development of
British identity, or even the evolution of British history should look
elsewhere.
No comments:
Post a Comment